Abstract Review and Editorial Policy
Each conference proceedings collection may be assigned a Guest Editor responsible for coordinating the scientific and editorial assessment of submitted abstracts.
The standard editorial workflow includes:
- Submission: Abstracts are received through the designated submission system or conference organizers.
- Preliminary screening: Submissions are checked for scope, completeness, formatting, originality, and ethical concerns.
- Scientific assessment: The Guest Editor evaluates the abstract and may consult appropriate subject experts or reviewers.
- Revision: Authors may be asked to address comments, clarify methods, correct errors, or improve presentation.
- Final decision: The revised abstract is evaluated for acceptance or rejection.
- Publication preparation: Accepted abstracts undergo copyediting, metadata preparation, and technical processing.
- Publication: Abstracts meeting all requirements are published online with their bibliographic information and individual DOI, subject to successful DOI registration.
Editorial decisions are based on scientific relevance, originality, clarity, methodological appropriateness, ethical compliance, and suitability for the conference. Payment of a processing fee does not guarantee acceptance. All abstracts must satisfy the applicable editorial requirements before publication.
